Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial shows data trading platforms enhance urban economic vitality, suggesting vital infrastructure links.
This study provides city-level causal evidence on the economic effects of data trading infrastructure. Treating the staggered establishment of data trading platforms (DTPs) across Chinese cities between 2014 and 2023 as a quasi-natural experiment, we estimate a multi-period difference-in-differences model using a balanced panel of 298 prefecture-level cities from 2000 to 2023. The baseline estimate indicates that DTP establishment increases night-time light intensity – our primary proxy for urban economic vitality – by 3.610 units, robust across all sensitivity specifications. Event-study analysis validates parallel trends, and a randomization-inference placebo test yields an empirical p-value below 0.001. A Bartik instrumental variable strategy produces a 2SLS estimate of 9.421 (p < 0.05), which we interpret as complementary given a moderately relevant first stage (F = 2.71). Mechanism tests reveal that DTPs promote innovation and digital economy employment. A dose–response analysis shows that each additional year of platform operation increases vitality by 0.876 units on average, but the marginal effect turns negative in cities with below-median internet penetration. These findings establish that DTPs can serve as effective institutional vehicles for data factor marketization, but their economic returns are contingent on complementary digital infrastructure investments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: