Systematic review finds significant variability in sphenoid sinus anatomy, influencing surgical safety in skull base procedures.
The sphenoid sinus (SS) exhibits significant anatomical variability that critically impacts the safety and efficacy of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to establish global prevalence rates for SS pneumatization patterns, extensions, and the relationship with adjacent neurovascular structures to guide surgical planning. A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science until October 2025. Studies reporting SS pneumatization types, extensions, and neurovascular protrusions/dehiscences based on imaging or cadaveric dissection were included. Random-effect models were used for the meta-analysis. The sellar type was the predominant pneumatization pattern, with the complete sellar type accounting for 48.39%. Statistically significant results were identified based on nationality and study type. Extensions into the greater wing (34.17%) and pterygoid process (25.51%) were common. The Vidian nerve (VN) showed the highest rates of protrusion (32.61%) and dehiscence (14.60%), followed by the internal carotid artery (ICA) (protrusion: 29.77%; dehiscence: 9.47%) and optic nerve (ON) (protrusion: 23.46%; dehiscence: 10.92%). The imaging modality used did not affect the neurovascular structure variations. The SS is a highly variable structure with frequent extensions that expose vital neurovascular structures to surgical risk. Although the subgroup analyses did not depict statistically significant results, computed tomography scan with less than 1 mm slice thickness should be used for evaluation of SS anatomy. The high prevalence of VN and ICA dehiscence necessitates rigorous preoperative evaluation. These findings provide a crucial anatomical reference for optimizing surgical approaches and minimizing complications in skull base surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadopoulos-Manolarakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: