Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study quantifies disability in cognitively disabled children, suggesting effective assessment methods.
BACKGROUND: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health-Children and Youth Version (ICF-CY)-check list, is a free tool, used to quantify disability. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-Children and Youth version [WHODAS 2-Children and Youth (WHODAS-Child)] is a less time-consuming tool, to quantify disability, based on the ICF-frame work. We aimed to quantify the disability of a group of cognitively disabled children using ICF-CY-checklist, WHODAS-Child and Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS) score. We compared scores obtained using ICF-CY and WHODAS-Child, with VSMS taken as reference and also compared ICF-CY and WHODAS-Child scores. We ascertained factors associated with greater disability. METHODS: A hospital based cross-sectional study with diagnostic test evaluation. RESULTS: Hundred cognitively disabled children were recruited (median age 6 years, 73% male). ICF-CY median 'b,' 'd,' and total scores were 8.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.95, 15.4), 23.7 (IQR: 14.9, 36.7) and 16.8 (IQR: 10.7, 27.4). On multivariable-regression-analysis, age-at-first-concern below one-year, diagnosis of autism-spectrum-disorder, family history of developmental-cognitive-disability, prematurity, low-birth-weight, motor deficits and higher-maternal-age were associated with worse cognitive ability. There was a significant negative correlation (rho = -0.50, P < 0.001) on comparison of ICF-CY with VSMS, and WHODAS-Child in relation to VSMS (rho = -0.42, P < 0.001). A positive correlation was found between ICF-CY-d-score and WHODAS-Child score (rho = 0.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The impairment and disability of a group of children can be captured using ICF-CY-checklist. The easier to administer, WHODAS-Child, matches well with ICF-CY 'd' scores and VSMS, and can be used for quantification of disability. This quantification can help to assess burden-of-illness, in a geographic area or due to a particular etiology and would serve to assess the effect of an intervention on these children, uniformly across the globe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iype et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: