Key result
Female sex was not associated with a different 90-day risk of ischemic stroke (RR 1.01) or major hemorrhage (RR 0.96) compared to male sex in older patients with atrial fibrillation taking DOACs.
Why the study?
Clinical trial evidence suggested a differential effect of sex on the effectiveness and safety of DOACs for stroke prophylaxis in AF.
Does female sex affect the risk of hemorrhage or ischemic stroke in older atrial fibrillation patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban?
Cohort (n=23,884)
Does female sex affect the risk of hemorrhage or ischemic stroke in older atrial fibrillation patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban?
In older patients with atrial fibrillation taking apixaban or rivaroxaban, sex is not associated with differential 90-day risks of hemorrhage or ischemic stroke, though females had lower risks of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality.
No sex-based difference seen in 90-day DOAC risks among elderly AF patients; leaves open need for longer-term confirmation.
BackgroundEvidence from clinical trials suggests a differential effect of sex on the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsThis population-based cohort study examined the independent effect of sex on hemorrhage and ischemic stroke in 23,884 patients (55% females; age ≥ 66 years) with AF starting apixaban or rivaroxaban treatment in Ontario, Canada. Patients were followed for 90 days after their DOAC prescription. Using female sex as the exposure of interest, differences in baseline characteristics were balanced between sexes using inverse probability weights based on propensity scores. Applying weighted modified Poisson regression, risk ratios (RRs) were estimated for major hemorrhage, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism/transient ischemic attack (hereafter stroke), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, with males as a reference.ResultsFemales were older, had higher predicted stroke risk (based on CHADS2 score), and had fewer comorbidities than did males. Males had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, diabetes, and cancer, and similar predicted bleeding risk (based on HAS-BLED score). After weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The 90-day risks for hemorrhage (RR 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-1.15; P = 0.69) and stroke (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19; P = 0.94) were similar between sexes, which remained true when assessing each DOAC separately by dosing regimen. Compared to males, females had a lower risk for myocardial infarction (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.84; P = 0.0008), and for all-cause mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.87; P < 0.0001).ConclusionsOur findings do not suggest an association of sex with the 90-day risk of hemorrhage or ischemic stroke in older AF patients prescribed apixaban or rivaroxaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulilat et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=23,884). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or transient ischemic attack (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.86-1.19, p=0.94). Female sex was not associated with a different 90-day risk of ischemic stroke (RR 1.01) or major hemorrhage (RR 0.96) compared to male sex in older patients with atrial fibrillation taking DOACs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: