Key result
Direct left ventricular guidewire pacing during balloon aortic valvuloplasty was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared to temporary right ventricular pacing (2.0% vs. 9.8%, p=0.01).
Why the study?
Rapid ventricular pacing is mandatory for balloon positioning during BAV, but the safety and efficacy of direct LV guidewire pacing compared to standard RV temporary pacemaker pacing needed assessment.
Does direct rapid left ventricular guidewire pacing improve safety and procedural efficiency compared to temporary right ventricular pacemaker placement in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty?
Population
202 patients undergoing BAV
Comparison
Direct LV guidewire pacing vs temporary PM placement in the right ventricle
Authors
Loading...
Direct LV guidewire pacing may simplify BAV with fewer complications; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Cohort (n=202)
Does direct rapid left ventricular guidewire pacing improve safety and procedural efficiency compared to temporary right ventricular pacemaker placement in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 9.8%
p-value: p=0.01
Direct rapid LV guidewire pacing during balloon aortic valvuloplasty is associated with shorter procedural times, lower radiation exposure, and fewer complications compared to traditional right ventricular temporary pacing.
Kleczyński et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=202). Direct left ventricular (LV) guidewire pacing vs. Temporary pacemaker placement in the right ventricle was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.01). Direct left ventricular guidewire pacing during balloon aortic valvuloplasty was associated with lower in-hospital mortality compared to temporary right ventricular pacing (2.0% vs. 9.8%, p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: