Key result
Intra-cardiac stem cell therapy improves post-ischemic function by activating acute macrophages to alter scar biomechanics.
Why the study?
Clinical trials of adult stem cells to regenerate damaged myocardium continue despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect.
Does intra-cardiac injection of progenitor cells or immune inducers improve heart function via an acute immune response in mice with I/R injury?
Does intra-cardiac injection of progenitor cells or immune inducers improve heart function via an acute immune response in mice with I/R injury?
The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy in ischemic injury is driven by an acute inflammatory wound healing response rather than cardiomyocyte regeneration, suggesting a need to re-evaluate the rationale for human clinical trials.
Clinical trials using adult stem cells to regenerate damaged heart tissue continue to this day 1–3 despite ongoing questions of efficacy and a lack of mechanistic understanding of the underlying biologic effect 4–6 . The rationale for these cell therapy trials is derived from animal studies that show a modest but reproducible improvement in cardiac function in models of cardiac ischemic injury 7–9 . Here we examined the mechanistic basis for cell therapy in mice after ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and while heart function was enhanced, it was not associated with new cardiomyocyte production. Cell therapy improved heart function through an acute sterile immune response characterized by the temporal and regional induction of CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophages. Here we observed that intra-cardiac injection of 2 distinct types of progenitor cells, freeze/thaw-killed cells or a chemical inducer of the innate immune response similarly induced regional CCR2 + and CX3CR1 + macrophage accumulation and provided functional rejuvenation to the I/R-injured heart. Mechanistically, this selective macrophage response altered cardiac fibroblast activity and reduced border zone extracellular matrix (ECM) content and enhanced the mechanical properties of the injured area. The functional benefit of cardiac cell therapy is thus due to an acute inflammatory-based wound healing response that rejuvenates the mechanical properties of the infarcted area of the heart. Such results suggest a re-evaluation of strategies underlying cardiac cell therapy in current and planned human clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vagnozzi et al. (2018) studied Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Intra-cardiac injection of adult stem cells (MNCs/CPCs) or zymosan vs. Saline was evaluated on Cardiac function (fractional shortening) post-ischemia/reperfusion injury. Intra-cardiac stem cell therapy improved post-ischemic heart function not via new cardiomyocytes, but by triggering an acute macrophage-mediated inflammatory response that altered scar biomechanics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: