Key result
A multi-modal deep learning model using attention-based convolutional and recurrent neural networks achieved a sensitivity of 93.88% and a specificity of 92.05% for classifying false arrhythmia alarms in the ICU.
Why the study?
Existing methods for suppressing ICU false alarms rely on rule-based systems requiring prior arrhythmia analysis knowledge or classical machine learning dependent on hand-engineered features.
Does an attention-based convolutional and recurrent neural network model improve the reduction of false arrhythmia alarms in ICUs compared to existing algorithms?
Does an attention-based convolutional and recurrent neural network model improve the reduction of false arrhythmia alarms in ICUs compared to existing algorithms?
A deep learning model using attention-based CNNs and LSTMs effectively reduces false arrhythmia alarms in ICUs using multi-modal biosignals.
DL model shows promise for ICU false-alarm suppression; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
This study proposes a deep learning model that effectively suppresses the false alarms in the intensive care units (ICUs) without ignoring the true alarms using single- and multi- modal biosignals. Most of the current work in the literature are either rule-based methods, requiring prior knowledge of arrhythmia analysis to build rules, or classical machine learning approaches, depending on hand-engineered features. In this work, we apply convolutional neural networks to automatically extract time-invariant features, an attention mechanism to put more emphasis on the important regions of the segmented input signal(s) that are more likely to contribute to an alarm, and long short-term memory units to capture the temporal information presented in the signal segments. We trained our method efficiently using a two-step training algorithm (i.e., pre-training and fine-tuning the proposed network) on the dataset provided by the PhysioNet computing in cardiology challenge 2015. The evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed method obtains better results compared to other existing algorithms for the false alarm reduction task in ICUs. The proposed method achieves a sensitivity of 93.88% and a specificity of 92.05% for the alarm classification, considering three different signals. In addition, our experiments for 5 separate alarm types leads significant results, where we just consider a single-lead ECG (e.g., a sensitivity of 90.71%, a specificity of 88.30%, an AUC of 89.51 for alarm type of Ventricular Tachycardia arrhythmia).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mousavi et al. (2020) studied False arrhythmia alarms in ICUs (n=750). Multi-modal attention-based convolutional and recurrent neural network vs. Existing algorithms and single-modal approaches was evaluated on Alarm classification sensitivity. A multi-modal deep learning model using attention-based convolutional and recurrent neural networks achieved a sensitivity of 93.88% and a specificity of 92.05% for classifying false arrhythmia alarms in the ICU.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: