Key result
E-Point Septal Separation measured via POCUS accurately diagnosed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) in emergency department patients, demonstrating an AUC-ROC of 0.91.
Why the study?
In the ED, thorough cardiovascular evaluation cannot be accomplished by physical examination alone, prompting evaluation of EPSS via POCUS to diagnose reduced LVEF.
Does E-Point Septal Separation (EPSS) measured by POCUS accurately diagnose reduced LVEF in ED patients with chest pain or dyspnea?
Observational (n=96)
Blinded (index and reference tests)
No
Does E-Point Septal Separation (EPSS) measured by POCUS accurately diagnose reduced LVEF in ED patients with chest pain or dyspnea?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EPSS measured by POCUS is a highly accurate tool for diagnosing reduced LVEF in emergency department patients presenting with cardiovascular symptoms.
Introduction: In the Emergency Department (ED), a thorough cardiovascular evaluation cannot be accomplished only with physical examination. E-Point Septal Separation (EPSS) measure through Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has been used to evaluate systolic function in echocardiography. We analyzed EPSS for diagnosis of Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction <50% and ≤40% in ED patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a convenience sample of patients presenting to ED with chest pain or dyspnea who underwent admission POCUS evaluation by Internal Medicine Specialist unaware of Transthoracic Echocardiogram. Accuracy was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR) and Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The best cut off point was calculated using Youden Index. Results: Ninety-six patients were included. Median EPSS and LVEF were 10mm and 41% respectively. Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC) to diagnose a LVEF <50% was 0.90 (IC95% 0.84-0.97). Youden Index was 0.71 with cut off point EPSS at 9.5mm, performing with a sensitivity of 0.80, a specificity of 0.91, a positive LR of 9.8 and a negative LR of 0.2. AUC-ROC to diagnose a LVEF ≤40% was 0.91 (IC95% 0.85-0.97). Youden Index was 0.71 with a cut off point EPSS at 9.5mm, performing with a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.80, a positive LR of 4.7 and a negative LR of 0.1. Conclusion: EPSS can reliably diagnose reduced LVEF in a set of ED patients with cardiovascular symptoms. A cut off point at 9.5 mm has good sensitivity, specificity and Likelihood ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Núñez-Ramos et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Chest pain or dyspnea with suspected left ventricular dysfunction (n=96). E-Point Septal Separation (EPSS) via Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE) LVEF calculation was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC-ROC) of EPSS to predict reduced Ejection Fraction (LVEF ≤40%) (AUC-ROC 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97). E-Point Septal Separation measured via POCUS accurately diagnosed reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) in emergency department patients, demonstrating an AUC-ROC of 0.91.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: