Why the study?
Nonvolumetric echocardiographic parameters for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction in coronary artery disease patients require prospective evaluation.
Observational (n=55)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was prospectively predicted by nonvolumetric parameters obtained by M-mode and two-dimensional (2DE) echocardiography in 55 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. In particular, the mitral E-point to septum separation (EPSS) could predict the angiographic ejection fraction (EF) according to the formula %EF = 74 - 2 (EPSS) with a correlation of 0.81 and a standard error of the estimate (SEE) of 12%. An EPSS of greater than 10 mm predicted ventricular dysfunction with a sensitivity of 0.81 and a specificity of 0.93. A Wall Motion Score (WMS), obtained by summing segmental wall motion assessed as normal = 4, hypokinetic = 3, akinetic = 2, dyskinetic = 1, for each of seven segments and dividing by seven (the number of segments evaluated), also correlated with the angiographic EF (r = .76). An abnormal WMS was found to be less than 3.3 and together with an EPSS greater than 10 mm, these parameters had a sensitivity of 0.90, a specificity of 0.92, and predictive value of 0.90 for ventricular dysfunction, as evidenced by an EF of less than 0.51. We conclude that the EPSS has a great a predictive value for the EF as the more vigorous quantitative volumetric echocardiographic estimates. Together with the WMS, these parameters are of considerable clinical value in detecting ventricular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shea et al. (1983) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=55). Nonvolumetric echocardiographic parameters (EPSS and Wall Motion Score) vs. Angiographic ejection fraction was evaluated on Prediction of angiographic ejection fraction and ventricular dysfunction (EF < 0.51) (Sensitivity 0.90, Specificity 0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: