Key result
MAPSE-derived EF significantly correlated with M-mode, Simpson's rule, and visual inspection (r=0.554 to 0.611, P<0.001), with the least mean difference of 0.5 ± 5.69% compared to M-mode.
Why the study?
Does a MAPSE-derived formula accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional echocardiographic methods in adult males with systolic dysfunction?
Observational (n=170)
Does a MAPSE-derived formula accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction compared to conventional echocardiographic methods in adult males with systolic dysfunction?
MAPSE-derived ejection fraction using a simple equation is a valid technique to estimate ejection fraction in adult males with severely impaired left ventricular systolic function.
OBJECTIVES: Validation of a mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE)-derived formula to calculate the ejection fraction where EF = 4.8 × MAPSE (mm) + 5.8 in adult males with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic assessment of LV function generally requires expert echocardiographer and is somewhat subjective and prone to reader discordance. MAPSE has been suggested as a surrogate measurement for LV function. METHODS: Prospective analysis of 170 male patients with systolic dysfunction by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was carried out. MAPSE and ejection fraction measured by qualitative visual inspection, M-mode, and biplane modified Simpson's rule were measured. MAPSE-derived EF was compared against other conventional methods to measure EF using Bland-Altman analysis and independent t-test. RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between average MAPSE and EF measured by M-mode (r = 0.554, P < 0.001), Simpson's rule (r = 0.585, P < 0.001), and visual inspection (r = 0.611, P < 0.001). An average MAPSE cutoff value <= 5 provided the best balanced sensitivity (67.1%) and specificity (76.5%) to predict EF < 30%. The mean difference between MAPSE-derived EF and EF measured by visual inspection and by Simpson's method was 3.86 ± 5.24% and 3.57 ± 5.97%, respectively. The least mean difference of 0.5 ± 5.69% was present between MAPSE-derived EF and M-mode-measured EF (P value 0.2). CONCLUSION: MAPSE-derived EF using the equation EF = 4.8 × MAPSE (mm) + 5.8 is a valid technique in adult males with severely impaired LV EF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adel et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=170). MAPSE-derived EF formula vs. Conventional echocardiographic methods (M-mode, Simpson's rule, visual inspection) was evaluated on Correlation and mean difference between MAPSE-derived EF and conventional methods (r = 0.554, p=<0.001). MAPSE-derived EF significantly correlated with M-mode, Simpson's rule, and visual inspection (r=0.554 to 0.611, P<0.001), with the least mean difference of 0.5 ± 5.69% compared to M-mode.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: