Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective observational study compares hypertension and treatment failure in treatment-naïve CLL/SLL on acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib.
Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are standard therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The second-generation BTKi, acalabrutinib, has similar efficacy but a more favorable cardiovascular toxicity profile than the first-generation BTKi ibrutinib. This retrospective, observational, real-world study used electronic medical records from ONCare Alliance, a network of 32 US community oncology/hematology practices. Adults (N = 454) with treatment-naïve CLL/SLL who initiated acalabrutinib or ibrutinib monotherapy between January 2017 and December 2023 were included (n = 227 per group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The primary endpoint was time to new/worsening hypertension; the key secondary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). After a median follow-up of 28 months, acalabrutinib had fewer discontinuations due to intolerability (19.4% vs 46.7%; p<.001), a significantly lower risk of new/worsening hypertension (HR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14–0.55; p<.001), and prolonged TTF (HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31–0.56; p<.001) versus ibrutinib. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated stability in the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Narkhede et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: