Analyzes how emotions and attachments evolve in land-use conflicts, indicating implications for political engagement.
Our paper analyzes the evolution of emotions and place attachments in land-use struggles. To do so, three opposition movements against different development projects (highway, prison, landfill) have been examined on the long run in France and Belgium. Our results highlight the transformations of emotions and attachments throughout the conflict, both socially (transmission of attachments) and spatially (new behaviors and knowledge). We call “affective capital” this socio-spatial built-up of attachments, that can lay the foundations of politicization and belonging processes. As a discussion, we propose a framework aiming at distinguishing the phases of emotions and attachments throughout territorial mobilizations: 1-Emotional clash: individual shock and deepening attachments; 2-Emotional buzz: socio-spatial translations of attachments; 3-Affective capital: collective acquired attachments bridging local and global issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Léa Sébastien (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: