Randomized trial estimates wrongful acquittal and conviction probabilities in defendants, suggesting potential flaws in justice outcomes.
We nonparametrically identify Type I and Type II error rates when mistakes are unobserved. Our strategy reframes the setting as a misclassified binary choice model, using a special regressor to identify the misclassification probabilities. Identification requires an exclusion restriction and a large support condition. When the exclusion restriction is in doubt, we show how our estimands can be interpreted as bounds under a weaker monotonicity condition. Bounds are also provided when the large support condition is violated. We apply our method to estimate miscarriages of justice in Virginia. Among defendants who proceeded to trial, the estimated probability of wrongful acquittal ranges from 18 to 42%, depending on offense type, race, and gender. Our method also produces estimates of wrongful conviction probabilities; however, these are very high, potentially reflecting the restriction of our sample to trial defendants and/or violations of key assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: