Meta-ethnography explores work experiences of employees with disability in hospitality, highlighting non-linear progress and systemic barriers.
This study presents a meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies exploring the work experiences of employees with disability in the hospitality industry. Drawing on multi-stakeholder perspectives from 13 studies, the synthesis identifies how inclusion is co-created across four interconnected domains: work, workplace, workforce, and the work-life interface. The synthesis reveals that while early accounts framed inclusion as symbolic or charitable, more recent studies trace a shift toward strength-based and relational practices. Findings highlight persistent structural barriers and stereotypes alongside the transformative potential of meaningful work, psychological safety, and radical reciprocity. Inclusion efforts were found to follow a non-linear yet positive trajectory, with progress often coexisting alongside tokenism and resistance. The study contributes a holistic framework that captures the work experiences of employees with disability from a multi-stakeholder perspective and introduces the concept of radical reciprocity to reframe inclusion as a co-created, mutually enriching process. These insights offer a hopeful, relational, and systemic approach to advancing employment equity and belonging for employees with disability in the hospitality industry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: