Retrospective analysis examines intra-articular vancomycin's effects on infections in total knee arthroplasty, suggesting limited benefit.
Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Vancomycin powder has been proposed as a low-cost adjunct to reduce infection by providing high local antibiotic concentrations with minimal systemic exposure; however, clinical evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intra-articular vancomycin powder on PJI, aseptic wound complications, and renal function in primary TKA. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent primary TKA between 2022 and 2024 with at least 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 661 patients were included: 247 received 1 g intra-articular vancomycin powder and 414 served as controls. All procedures were performed with standardized perioperative protocols. Demographics, comorbidities, and high-risk status were recorded. Outcomes included PJI, aseptic wound complications, and acute kidney injury. Results: PJI occurred in 7 patients (1.1%): 6 in the control group (1.4%) and 1 in the vancomycin group (0.4%), with no significant difference ( P = .266). Aseptic wound complications were observed in 28 patients (4.2%), including 20 control patients (4.8%) and 8 vancomycin patients (3.2%) ( P = .326). Acute kidney injury occurred in 12 patients (1.8%), with comparable rates between groups ( P = 1.000). Conclusion: Intra-articular vancomycin powder did not result in a statistically significant reduction in PJI rates, while demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Although safe, routine use may not provide additional measurable benefit in optimized surgical settings with low baseline infection rates. Larger, well-designed randomized trials are required to identify patient subgroups who may benefit from selective application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şibar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: