Investigates joint degradation effects on stand-up time in rock structures, indicating design implications.
The progressive degradation of joints in rock masses may occur through time-dependent failure of intact rock bridges along discontinuity planes, leading to a reduction in joint cohesive strength and, ultimately, to the onset of instability in underground excavations. This paper investigates the role of rock bridges in controlling the stability of a symmetrical roof block in a circular opening, under the assumption of temporally evolving bridge failure and the associated reduction in joint cohesion, in order to estimate the stand-up time of the block. The analytical framework is developed under plane-strain conditions. Five parametric scenarios are defined based on distinct fracture toughness values, which are interpreted as representative of different rock-quality classes. The results indicate that cohesion decays over time to a critical threshold at which the block attains limit equilibrium, thereby defining the stand-up time for each scenario. A global sensitivity analysis, combining the Morris elementary-effects method with Monte Carlo–based uncertainty propagation, demonstrates that the in situ stress ratio, the bridge-to-joint length ratio, and the joint friction angle are the primary controlling parameters. These factors exhibit comparable influence and are markedly more important than the parameters governing subcritical crack-growth kinetics. Complementary finite-element simulations conducted with RS2 illustrate the stress distribution mechanism that drives bridge-localized failure. Incorporating both time-dependent degradation mechanisms and reliability-based uncertainty propagation facilitates a probabilistic estimation of stand-up time, thereby providing a more robust basis for the design and safety assessment of underground excavations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lima et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: