Computational analysis demonstrates trifluorodimethyl sulfide's viability as a refrigerant, indicating excellent stability and environmental safety.
Trifluorodimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCF 3 ) has been proposed to be a potential alternative refrigerant based on various rigorous quantum chemistry calculations. It is revealed that the half F-substitution is capable of tuning the stability and reactivity of dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 ) significantly. The strength of both S–C bonds is enhanced. The bond dissociation energies increase by 5–6 kcal/mol with respect to CH 3 SCH 3, and decomposition temperature of CH 3 SCF 3 is predicted to be 875 K. Meanwhile, the existence of CH 3 group keeps the good reactivity of CH 3 SCF 3 toward OH radicals in the troposphere. Complex-forming H-abstraction to produce H 2 O and CF 3 SCH 2 radicals is the predominant mechanism accompanied by minor S–O association/elimination pathways. The atmospheric lifetime and radiative efficiency of CH 3 SCF 3 is 0.2–1 years and 0.25 Wm 2– ppb –1, respectively, leading to a global warming potential of 9–90 for a 100-year time horizon. The possible degradation products of CH 3 SCF 3 in the atmosphere include both radicals, e.g., CF 3 SCH 2 OO, CF 3 SCH 2 OONO, CF 3 SCH 2 OONO 2, CF 3 SCH 2 O, CF 3 S, and molecules, e.g., (CF 3 SCH 2 OO) 2, CF 3 SCH 2 OOH, CH 2 O, and CH 3 S(O)CF 3 . The present computational work not only provides interesting insights into the dramatic impact of the partial fluorination on stability and reactivity of sulfides but also demonstrates that CH 3 SCF 3 should be a viable refrigerant replacement for hydrofluorocarbons and even hydrofluoroolefins with excellent thermal stability and environmental sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: