What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and diagnostic accuracy of the VISION-Cog protocol for cognitive impairment in individuals with vision impairment.

June 27, 2026Medical SciencesOpen Access

Evaluating the Acceptability and Pilot Diagnostic Accuracy of a Visually Independent Test Battery of Neurocognition (VISION-Cog)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HYHiromi YeeSingapore National Eye Center AHAricia Xin Yi HoSingapore National Eye Center JWJohnny WongSingapore National Eye Center

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Cross-sectional study evaluates diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of VISION-Cog in older adults with vision impairment, suggesting its potential utility.

Key Points

This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and diagnostic accuracy of the VISION-Cog protocol for cognitive impairment in individuals with vision impairment.
Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling older adults with near vision impairment (NVA ≥0.2 LogMAR) from the PIONEER study.
Participants completed the VISION-Cog and MoCA-SG tests, followed by neurologist evaluations.
Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using binary logistic regression and C-statistics to calculate AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.
Of 45 participants, 37 (82.2%) completed the VISION-Cog protocol.
VISION-Cog achieved an AUC of 0.930, with 100.0% sensitivity and 78.0% specificity against neurologist diagnosis.
Participants reported acceptable testing time for VISION-Cog.

Cite This Study

Yee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f6843aea7db3c1953f648 https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14030344

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

June 27, 2026Medical SciencesOpen Access

Evaluating the Acceptability and Pilot Diagnostic Accuracy of a Visually Independent Test Battery of Neurocognition (VISION-Cog)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

HYHiromi YeeSingapore National Eye Center AHAricia Xin Yi HoSingapore National Eye Center JWJohnny WongSingapore National Eye Center

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Cross-sectional study evaluates diagnostic accuracy and acceptability of VISION-Cog in older adults with vision impairment, suggesting its potential utility.

Key Points

This study aims to evaluate the acceptability and diagnostic accuracy of the VISION-Cog protocol for cognitive impairment in individuals with vision impairment.
Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling older adults with near vision impairment (NVA ≥0.2 LogMAR) from the PIONEER study.
Participants completed the VISION-Cog and MoCA-SG tests, followed by neurologist evaluations.
Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using binary logistic regression and C-statistics to calculate AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.
Of 45 participants, 37 (82.2%) completed the VISION-Cog protocol.
VISION-Cog achieved an AUC of 0.930, with 100.0% sensitivity and 78.0% specificity against neurologist diagnosis.
Participants reported acceptable testing time for VISION-Cog.

Cite This Study

Yee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f6843aea7db3c1953f648 https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14030344

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark