Evaluates user experience using the validated Chinese AttrakDiff 2 among university students, suggesting its reliability for assessments.
User experience is critical for evaluating products and service systems, yet validated Chinese instruments remain limited. The AttrakDiff 2 is a widely used questionnaire for assessing pragmatic and hedonic qualities and overall attractiveness. This study translated and culturally adapted AttrakDiff 2 into Chinese (AttrakDiff 2-CN) using a five-stage protocol and evaluated its psychometric properties among 1,142 university students. Analyses included classical test theory, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, item response theory, and multi-group measurement invariance testing. Although exploratory factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution, confirmatory factor analysis supported the theoretical four-factor model (pragmatic quality, hedonic identity, hedonic stimulation, attractiveness) with excellent fit (χ2/df = 2.41, CFI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.048). The 28-item semantic-differential scale demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.976), acceptable convergent and discriminant validity, full measurement invariance (ΔCFI ≤ 0.001, ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.001), and high item discrimination (a = 1.020–6.730). AttrakDiff 2-CN is a reliable, valid, and culturally attuned tool for user experience assessment in the Chinese context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: