Examines the link between staff choice, stability, and quality of life in individuals with IDD, suggesting benefits for community participation.
Background and Aims Direct support professionals (DSPs) are essential to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), yet staff turnover remains a significant concern. This study examined whether individuals with IDD in the United States are involved in choosing their staff, how they perceive staff turnover and whether perceived staff stability is associated with quality of life. Methods Data from the 2022–2023 National Core Indicators–In Person Survey were analysed to assess relationships between staff choice, perceived staff stability and outcomes related to everyday choice, support‐related choice and alignment of community activities with personal preferences. Results Individuals involved in choosing their staff were more likely to report greater staff stability. Perceived staff stability was associated with better alignment between community participation and personal preferences but was not significantly associated with choice‐making outcomes. Conclusion Findings support person‐directed service models and highlight the value of involving individuals with IDD in staffing decisions to promote staff stability and person‐centred community participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houseworth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: