Investigates how changes in cylinder power and axis affect vision in astigmatic subjects, suggesting significant visual impacts.
Purpose: To investigate the effect of higher cylindrical power and axis misalignment of toric SCL in mild and moderate astigmatism on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual satisfaction, and vision acceptability. Methods: 20 astigmatic participants underwent randomized experimental trial for the following conditions on different days: full cylinder power, higher cylindrical power by 0.5D, and higher cylindrical power by 1.0DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10 and +10degree for each cylinder power alteration. Baseline and outcome variables were assessed using: Snellen chart for visual acuity, Pelli-Robson Chart for contrast sensitivity, and VAS scale for visual clarity, satisfaction and vision acceptability. Results: Overcorrecting cylinder power resulted in significant effect (p<0.05) on all variables. Overall, higher cylindrical power by 1.0DC had stronger statistical evidence (p<0.01) than 0.5DC. There was no significant difference between the mild and moderate astigmatism groups, except for the visual acuity when higher cylindrical power by 0.5 D was implemented. Misalignment by both +10° and -10° had a significant effect on all variables, except contrast sensitivity. Conclusion: Toric SCL with higher cylindrical power by 0.5DC and 1.0DC as well as misalignment of 10° had a significant effect on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, clarity, satisfaction, and vision acceptability in patients with mild to moderate astigmatism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aprina et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: