Shows enhanced capacity allocation reduces energy curtailment in coastal power grids, suggesting efficient resource utilization.
The integration of high-penetration renewable energy creates new requirements for cross-timescale peak shaving and for system robustness under extreme meteorological conditions. This study develops a dual-timescale capacity allocation method for pumped hydro storage (PHS), combining 8760 h chronological production simulation with monthly typical-day retrospective analysis. The model represents the operating limits of conventional units, nuclear power, hydropower, wind power, photovoltaic generation, tie-line exchange, and PHS energy shifting. On this basis, a stepwise capacity-sensitivity framework is established to minimize annualized comprehensive system cost while controlling renewable energy curtailment within a predefined planning threshold, rather than treating zero curtailment as an unconditional monthly hard constraint. Using long-term planning data from a coastal provincial power grid in southeastern China, the study compares the 2035 and 2040 planning scenarios. The results show that isolated typical-day models tend to overestimate PHS requirements because they disconnect chronological continuity and cross-day reservoir buffering. In 2035, the system presents a two-level seasonal capacity structure: 15,000 MW can support normalized operation in stable months, whereas the rigid boundary rises to 19,000 MW under extreme autumn high-wind conditions. In 2040, wind and photovoltaic capacity increase by approximately 20.01 GW compared with 2035, deepening low-net-load valleys and compressing seasonal regulation margins. Under the assumed planning boundary, the recommended PHS capacity converges to 23,000 MW. The proposed framework provides a practical reference for flexible resource planning in coastal power grids with deep renewable energy integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: