Key result
General anesthesia shows no difference in AKI risk versus spinal anesthesia in staged bilateral TKA.
Why the study?
Evidence on spinal versus general anesthesia in unilateral TKA may not extend to one-week-staged bilateral surgery, where patients receive two anesthetics shortly apart and spinal-to-general conversion is rarely reported.
Does spinal anesthesia reduce acute kidney injury and transfusion compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing one-week-staged bilateral primary TKA?
Observational (n=207)
No
Does spinal anesthesia reduce acute kidney injury and transfusion compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing one-week-staged bilateral primary TKA?
In older patients undergoing one-week-staged bilateral TKA, the choice between spinal and general anesthesia did not significantly impact peri-operative AKI or transfusion rates.
No difference in AKI or transfusion by anesthesia type; leaves open any spinal benefit in one-week-staged bilateral TKA.
Background/Objectives: Evidence on spinal versus general anesthesia in unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may not extend to one-week-staged bilateral surgery, where older patients receive two anesthetics in a short interval and intra-operative spinal-to-general conversion is common but rarely reported transparently. We compared peri-operative acute kidney injury (AKI) and transfusion between strategies in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients (414 surgeries) undergoing one-week-staged bilateral primary TKA at one center. Co-primary endpoints were creatinine-based AKI (patient level) and packed-red-blood-cell transfusion (surgery level). Because 42 general-anesthesia-classified surgeries had an attempted spinal injection, the primary analysis used the initial anesthetic plan (an intention-to-treat analogue), reclassifying these as spinal, with as-treated classification as a sensitivity analysis; AKI was modeled at the patient level (any general anesthesia versus spinal–spinal) and transfusion per surgery. Results: Median age was 75 years and 82.6% were female; AKI affected 74 of 207 patients (35.7%) and transfusion 185 of 414 surgeries (44.7%). The adjusted any-general-anesthesia versus spinal–spinal estimate was not statistically significant and opposite the spinal-protective hypothesis (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.23–1.01, p = 0.054), and no pre-specified sensitivity scenario survived Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Transfusion did not differ between strategies; among secondary endpoints, length of stay, hemoglobin drop, peak C-reactive protein, and intra-operative hypotension likewise showed no significant difference after multiplicity correction. Conclusions: These hypothesis-generating findings do not support changing anesthetic practice; the choice should remain individualized. Approximately 12% of attempted spinal anesthetics converted intra-operatively to general anesthesia—a record-based observation, not a validated failure rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) conducted an observational in One-week-staged bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (n=207). Any general anesthesia vs. Spinal-spinal anesthesia was evaluated on Creatinine-based acute kidney injury (patient level) and packed-red-blood-cell transfusion (surgery level) (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-1.01, p=0.054). Any general anesthesia compared to spinal-spinal anesthesia did not significantly affect the odds of acute kidney injury in one-week-staged bilateral TKA (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.23-1.01; p=0.054).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: