Key result
Spinal anesthesia was not associated with any significant difference in mortality rates up to 90 days after total joint arthroplasty compared to general anesthesia, but was associated with fewer blood transfusions.
Why the study?
Spinal anesthesia offers benefits over general anesthesia in total hip or knee arthroplasty, but few studies have explored associated rates of morbidity and mortality.
Does spinal anesthesia improve perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis?
Cohort (n=11,680)
Yes
Does spinal anesthesia improve perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis?
Odds Ratio: 1.08 (95% CI 1.05–1.12)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.2% vs 0.1%
Spinal anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty is associated with a reduced need for blood transfusions and no difference in 90-day mortality compared to general anesthesia.
No mortality difference seen; leaves open whether spinal anesthesia reduces complications in THA/TKA.
BACKGROUND: Compared with general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia has many benefits for patients undergoing total hip (THA) or total knee (TKA) arthroplasty, but few studies have explored rates of morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes by anesthetic type for patients undergoing THA or TKA for osteoarthritis. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent primary THA or TKA from the affiliated institute's database. We calculated inpatient, 30-day, 60-day and 90-day mortality rates, as well as 90-day perioperative complications, readmissions and length of stay (LOS). We compared outcomes between groups using logistic regression and propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 6100 (52.2%) patients undergoing THA and 5580 (47.8%) undergoing TKA. We found no differences by anesthetic type in mortality rates up to 90 days after surgery. Patients under spinal anesthesia were less likely to need a blood transfusion (THA odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.92; TKA OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.67) and were more likely to be discharged home among those who underwent TKA (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.00). Patients who received spinal anesthesia for THA had a longer LOS (0.28 d, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.39), and patients who received spinal anesthesia for TKA had a shorter LOS than those who received general anesthesia (-0.34 d, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.18). Anesthetic type was not associated with any difference in adverse events. CONCLUSION: These findings may inform decisions on anesthetic type for total joint arthroplasty, especially for rapid discharge protocols. Further research is needed to understand postoperative pain and functional outcomes between anesthetic types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourget-Murray et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Osteoarthritis undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (n=11,680). Spinal anesthesia vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on 90-day mortality (THA cohort) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.12). Spinal anesthesia was not associated with any significant difference in mortality rates up to 90 days after total joint arthroplasty compared to general anesthesia, but was associated with fewer blood transfusions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: