Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines energy management effectiveness in multi-building setups, suggesting improved coordination.
Community multi-building energy management is a key approach for reducing carbon emissions from the building sector and alleviating peak grid pressure. However, load coupling among buildings and coordinated energy-storage operation make control-policy design highly challenging. To address the limitation of the standard multi-agent proximal policy optimization (MAPPO) algorithm, in which the centralized critic simply concatenates building observations and therefore struggles to model inter-building interactions, this paper proposes an improved MAPPO algorithm with a multi-head-attention-enhanced centralized critic, referred to as a multi-head-attention MAPPO (MHA-MAPPO). Without changing the decentralized execution framework, the proposed method improves the critic network in three aspects. First, a dual-branch gated embedding module is designed to adaptively fuse local building observations and global interaction information. Second, an interaction-attention path is constructed to explicitly capture pairwise dependencies among buildings through multi-head attention. Third, a context-attention path is introduced to extract high-level community-level global features by means of learnable query vectors. These improvements enable the critic to estimate the joint-state value more accurately and provide more reliable advantage estimates for all agents. Experiments in the CityLearn environment show that, compared with the original MAPPO, MHA-MAPPO improves the mean evaluation reward by approximately 19.2%, reduces the reward standard deviation by one order of magnitude, and decreases peak net load and total net load by approximately 15.4% and 35.5%, respectively. The results verify the effectiveness of multi-head attention for coordinated multi-building scheduling. The proposed method provides a useful reference for improving multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms in community energy management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: