Examines behavioral readiness for walking and cycling to school in Spanish youth, suggesting useful assessment tools.
Introduction Active commuting to school (ACS) is a feasible and sustainable way to increase daily physical activity among youth. However, validated and context-specific measures of behavioural readiness remain limited. This study examined the reliability and predictive validity of two single-item scales assessing stage-based behavioural readiness for walking and cycling to school in Spanish youth: the Stage of Change for Walking to and from School (SC-W) and the Stage of Change for Cycling to and from School (SC-C). A secondary aim was to describe the distribution of participants across stages of change for walking and cycling by age group and gender. Methods A total of 372 students (13.1 ± 2.4 years, 52% girls) participated in this study. Of these, 333 provided valid SC-W data and 322 valid SC-C data. Both scales were administered twice over a 14 day interval. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using weighted kappa, and predictive validity for walking was tested using logistic regression models using the Stage of Change score as a predictor of usual walking to school. Results Reliability was moderate to substantial for both scales (SC-W: κ = 0.558, 95% CI [0.441,0.668]; SC-C: κ = 0.552, 95% CI [0.436,0.670]). Predictive validity was supported for walking among adolescents (B = 0.997, OR = 2.71, R 2 = 0.331, p < 0.001), with higher stages associated with a greater likelihood of walking to school. Among children, the association was weaker and not statistically significant (B = 0.237, OR = 1.27, R 2 = 0.045, p = 0.060). Walking was common among adolescents, whereas cycling was rarely reported. Conclusion The SC-W and SC-C scales showed acceptable reliability. Predictive validity was supported for walking, especially among adolescents, while cycling could not be tested due to low prevalence. These brief scales may provide low-burden tools to assess stage-based behavioural readiness toward ACS, particularly for walking among adolescents, although further validation is needed, especially for cycling behaviours and younger populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez-Sanchez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: