Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study explores capturing weight-loss goals in adults, indicating future intervention improvements.
Understanding patients’ self-articulated weight-loss goals may support tailored weight-management interventions; however, reproducible methods to capture and classify free-text goal content are limited. This pilot study aimed to develop and preliminarily evaluate a laddering-informed free-text elicitation and classification protocol, and to explore its associations with motivational quality and short-term weight change. Adults with a body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m² enrolled in a 3-month digital behavioral weight-management program completed two free-text prompts. Responses were coded by two trained raters, using rules mapped to the Aspiration Index (AI) and the Goal Content for Weight Maintenance Scale (GCWMS). Inter-rater agreement was excellent (Cohen’s κ = 0.91 for both frameworks). The protocol yielded analyzable data. AI showed better operational fit than GCWMS, with fewer unclassified (“Other”) responses (2.1% vs. 19.1%). Differences in motivational quality across goal-content categories were small (partial η² = 0.005–0.032). In exploratory models, engagement was positively associated with weight loss, whereas autonomous motivation showed a negative association over the short observation period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagasawa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: