Argues that autonomous business processes need governance to ensure operational autonomy, indicating vital gaps.
At SAP Sapphire 2026, SAP set out an ambitious vision in which AI agents run core business processes while people focus on higher-value work. That vision was told almost entirely from the application tier down: finance closes itself, procurement negotiates, supply chains reroute autonomously. This paper argues that the narrative leaves a critical question unanswered, when agents run the business, who runs the agents? It names the resulting risk the Operational Autonomy Gap, the widening distance between how autonomous business processes have become and how autonomous the operations beneath them remain, and proposes a five-level model of autonomous SAP operations to diagnose it. It then sets out four pillars for closing the gap, observability, self-healing, continuously validated resilience, and de-identified non-production data, and describes the governance role Basis and operations teams must claim as the discipline shifts from firefighting to orchestration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puneet Khatri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: