Why the study?
Demand for cardiac rehabilitation professionals in China outstrips resources, and higher education lacks standardized training frameworks for cardiac rehabilitation nursing.
A Delphi consensus established a structured, competency-based clinical training framework for master's degree candidates in cardiac rehabilitation nursing in China.
Background China faces a growing demand for cardiac rehabilitation professionals that outstrips available medical resources. While nursing master's candidates represent key talent reserves, current higher education lacks standardized training frameworks for cardiac rehabilitation nursing. This study developed a competency-based clinical training system through expert consensus to address this educational gap. Methods A modified two-round Delphi process engaged 22 cardiac rehabilitation experts. Initial expert feedback informed questionnaire refinement, followed by consensus-building analysis in the second round. Results The Delphi study demonstrated high engagement (100% Round 1; 96% Round 2 response rates) and acceptable expert authority (Cr = 0.83‑0.84). Kendall’s W values ranged from 0.13 to 0.21 (p < 0.05), indicating moderate agreement among experts. The consensus process yielded a structured framework of 5 domains, 29 subdomains, and 85 competency indicators. Conclusion The teaching system is scientifically valid, targeted, and practical, providing a comprehensive framework for training master's degree candidates in cardiac rehabilitation nursing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied Cardiac rehabilitation nursing education (n=22). Competency-based clinical training system development was evaluated on Consensus on a structured framework of competency indicators. A modified two-round Delphi process with 22 experts yielded a structured competency-based clinical training framework for cardiac rehabilitation nursing comprising 5 domains and 85 indicators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: