Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates c-MET and AKT targeting to improve therapeutic sensitivity in NSCLC, indicating a promising strategy.
Aberrant activation of c-MET signaling contributes to tumor progression and resistance to therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet its therapeutic significance remains incompletely understood. In this study, we evaluated c-MET expression and its association with AKT activation and clinical outcomes using a tissue microarray cohort and publicly available datasets. c-MET overexpression was significantly associated with increased p-AKT expression and showed a trend toward poorer overall survival in the tissue microarray cohort, while analysis of the TCGA LUAD dataset confirmed a significant association with reduced survival (log-rank p = 0.0223; HR = 1.234, 95% CI: 1.029–1.480). Functional studies demonstrated that pharmacological inhibition of c-MET suppressed cell proliferation and induced caspase-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis in NSCLC cell lines. Mechanistically, c-MET inhibition resulted in AKT inactivation, identifying AKT as a key downstream mediator of c-MET signaling. Notably, combined inhibition of c-MET (PHA665752) and AKT (MK2206) exhibited strong synergistic effects, significantly enhancing apoptosis and reducing cell viability compared to single-agent treatments. These findings were further validated in vivo, where combination therapy markedly delayed tumor growth without significant toxicity. Collectively, our results highlight c-MET-driven AKT activation as a key oncogenic mechanism and support dual c-MET/AKT targeting as a promising therapeutic strategy for NSCLC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratheeshkumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: