Demonstrates improved event attendance using influencer + follower strategies in social networks, indicating effective marketing approaches.
Given influencers’ greater social influence, managers are often advised to target influencers alone in social media marketing. However, the spread of word-of-mouth (WOM) may be enhanced by social affirmation (i.e., cues a message is valuable to others). The authors show that an influencer + follower seeding strategy, in which the best influencer-follower pair in a social network is chosen to tweet and retweet a message, respectively, outperforms an influencer-only strategy in spreading word-of-mouth. Lab experiments show that the likelihood that a user chooses to share or engage with a promoted tweet is higher under an influencer + follower strategy than under an influencer-only or influencer-twice strategy. Greater perceived message value to others explains these results. A field study involving promoted tweets shows that an influencer + follower strategy leads to greater event attendance than a two-influencer strategy. Simulation results show that the advantages of influencer + follower seeding strategies over influencer-only strategies are greater for social networks characterized by a stronger response to social affirmation. When social affirmation is not important to WOM diffusion, an influencer-only seeding strategy is superior. These findings contribute to research on seeding strategies and provide firms a way to improve return on investments in influencer marketing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: