Cross-sectional survey identifies exercise factors in autoimmune myasthenia gravis, suggesting targeted interventions are needed.
Introduction Knowledge about facilitators and barriers to exercise among individuals with MG is limited. Objective The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence exercise participation for adults with MG and to explore beliefs and perceptions with respect to exercise. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study via an online questionnaire. Adults with MG residing in France were eligible. Results Responses from 455 participants were analysed. The majority were between 50 and 69 years, 71% were female, 80% had generalised MG, and half had early-onset MG. Participants reported reduced MG-specific QoL (MGQOL-15F-r), a moderate-to-high impact of MG on activities of daily living (MG-ADL), and mild-to-moderate fatigue levels (NeuroQoL fatigue). Overall, 54% of respondents reported engaging in exercise (“exercisers”), while 47% did not (“non-exercisers”). Exercisers had a lower BMI, reported less fatigue, better HRQoL and a lower impact of MG on ADLs compared to non-exercisers. Fear of exercising was reported by one-third of participants, including half of non-exercisers versus 19% of exercisers (p < 0.001). Non-exercisers reported significantly more barriers to exercise (mean 3.5 (1.8)) than exercisers (mean 2.6 (1.9), p < 0.001). Health/symptoms was the most frequently reported barrier in both groups (59% of non-exercisers, 39% of exercisers). Non-exercisers also reported fewer facilitators (mean 2.1 (1.4)) than for exercisers (mean 2.5 (1.3), p=0.004). The most frequently cited facilitator for non-exercisers was specialised supervision/coaching (59%), while exercisers most frequently cited health/symptom improvement (57%). Conclusion Several barriers and facilitators influencing exercise participation for individuals with MG could be addressed with tailored programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Birnbaum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: