Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates risk of violent victimisation in adolescents with traumatic brain injury, suggesting targeted interventions are needed.
Background Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at a greater risk of subsequent violent victimisation, and a prognostic model can assist in identifying those at highest risk who can benefit from targeted interventions. We aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model to estimate the risk of violent victimisation following TBI in adolescence. Methods We investigated a cohort of adolescents aged 10 to 24 exposed to TBI between 2009 and 2023, using data from a linked register, covering 86% of the population in Wales, the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. We fitted a multivariable Cox regression model for the association between predictors and time to violent victimisation identified in medical records, with optimism-corrected bootstrapping for internal validation. Key performance measures, including discrimination and calibration, were examined at 1 and 3 years post-TBI. Results The cohort included 34 092 adolescents, of whom 332 (1.0%) were violently victimised within 1 year and 701 (2.1%) within 3 years of the TBI. The final model included a range of predictors including calendar age, sex at birth, substance misuse, psychiatric conditions, neurological conditions, conduct disorder, learning difficulties and a history of victimisation or self-harm. The clinical prediction model showed good calibration and moderate discrimination at 1 (area under the curve (AUC)=0.72) and 3 years (AUC=0.67) post-TBI. Discussion This brief, scalable and evidence-based prediction model showed moderate predictive performance at internal validation. External validation is necessary to test the model’s transportability. Conclusions A large population-based sample was used to identify risk factors for violent victimisation and develop a novel clinical prediction model for use in adolescents with TBI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogonah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: