Reveals the role of pre-disturbance dominance in invasive plant success, suggesting important ecological implications.
Background Fire is a key ecological disturbance that can facilitate plant invasions, but the mechanisms driving post-disturbance competitive outcomes, especially the role of pre-existing species abundance, remain poorly understood. We conducted a greenhouse experiment using wetland plant species to test how fire and pre-disturbance dominance influence performance and competitive interactions between a widespread invasive alien grass (Urochloa arrecta)and a resident native grass (Hemarthria altissima). Fire was simulated across a gradient of invasive dominance, including native monoculture (0%), native dominance (25%), invasive dominance (75%), and invasive monoculture(100%), allowing us to assess whether post-fire competitive outcomes depend on initial community composition. Results The competitive advantage of invasive alien plant species (IAPS) was driven by a superior regenerative strategy rather than by consistently greater biomass production. After fire, IAPS sprout production was critically dependent onits initial dominance, more than doubling under high-abundance conditions. Crucially, high IAPS dominance suppressed the number of native plant species (NPS) sprouts and delayed their emergence. In contrast, at low pre-disturbance abundance, the IAPS exhibited reduced regenerative performance. Conclusions Our findings show that post-fire invasion success is density-dependent: only when already dominant does the invasive species gain a regenerative advantage by suppressing native sprout production and delaying the native emergence. These results demonstrate that pre-disturbance dominance and vegetative propagule pressure, particularly from the bud bank and clonal vegetative structures, are key mediators of post-disturbance success. Given the increasing global frequency of both fire disturbances and plant invasions, our study provides a mechanistic explanation for why fire promotes invasion under some dominance contexts but not others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: