Study assess antipsychotic-like effects in mice, suggesting new treatment avenues for psychosis.
Background: Psychosis, as a comorbidity, is seen in many neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders and is often treated with dopamine D 2 receptor (D 2 R) antagonists, which could aggravate Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms. Hence, there is a need for new treatments with a non-D 2 R antagonist-related mechanism of action. Recently approved drugs for psychosis in PD, including pimavanserin (PIM), and for schizophrenia, xanomeline-trospium, offer advances since they lack D 2 R antagonism but both carry associated risks. The highly-purified, plant-derived form of cannabidiol (hpCBD; Epidiolex ® ) has a different safety profile, does not inhibit D 2 R and has demonstrated antipsychotic effects in patients with psychosis. Aims: To systematically assess the potential antipsychotic-like effects of hpCBD, alongside newer non-D 2 antagonist drugs approved for PD psychosis (PIM) and schizophrenia psychosis (xanomeline oxalate (XAN)) in the same set of standardised preclinical assays. Methods: MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion and pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) deficits in male C57BL/6J mice were assessed following PIM (0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg s.c.), XAN (1, 3, 10 mg/kg s.c.) or hpCBD (50, 100, 200 mg/kg i.p.) administration. Locomotor activity was measured by infrared photobeams and Laboratory Animal Behaviour Observation Registration and Analysis System, and PPI was measured in acoustic startle chambers using a variable pre-pulse intensity protocol. Results: PIM, XAN (all doses) and hpCBD (200 mg/kg) attenuated MK-801 hyperlocomotion ( p < 0.01). PPI deficits, at various pre-pulse intensities, were attenuated by PIM (all doses), XAN 10 mg/kg and hpCBD 200 mg/kg ( p < 0.05). Conclusion: These results suggest that hpCBD, like PIM and XAN, demonstrates putative antipsychotic-like activity in classic mouse assays relevant to psychosis, consistent with positive clinical data in patients with psychosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cilia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: