Key result
Out-of-field dose profiling reveals significant low-dose heart and lung discrepancies versus standard TPS calculations.
Why the study?
Accurate cardiopulmonary dose estimation is essential for assessing toxicity after radiotherapy, but DICOM-RT datasets often lack reliable out-of-field dose information.
Observational (n=149)
Standard treatment planning system dose calculations may inaccurately estimate low-dose radiation exposure (<10 Gy) to the heart and lungs in breast cancer radiotherapy, particularly for 3DCRT.
PURPOSE Accurate dose estimation to the heart and lungs is essential for assessing cardiopulmonary toxicity in women treated with radiotherapy (RT). However, DICOM-RT datasets often lack reliable dose information for organs located partly or entirely outside the beam path, limiting large-scale dose-response studies. We introduce an approach that supplements native DICOM-RT dose data with publicly available out-of-field (OOF) dose profiles to improve dose estimation in these regions, and apply it to breast cancer RT. METHODS Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the heart and lungs were evaluated in 149 patients. Voxels inside the beam path were assigned TPS doses from RT-Dose. Outside, a percent-depth-dose (PDD) and off-axis-ratio formalism was used to re-estimate voxel dose. Extended off-axis-ratio values were derived from empirical OOF-dose datasets. Geometric beam parameters for patient-specific 3D dose reconstruction were obtained from DICOM-RT files. Paired DVH metrics from TPS and re-evaluated doses were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS For volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), no significant differences were observed between DVH metrics derived from the TPS and those obtained from re-evaluated dose distributions. In contrast, significant differences were found in the low-dose region (<10 Gy) for non-VMAT techniques, with the largest discrepancies for three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT). CONCLUSIONS For studies of normal-tissue responses below 10 Gy, limitations of TPS dose calculations beyond the field edge must be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diallo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Breast cancer (n=149). Re-evaluated dose distributions using out-of-field dose profiles vs. Treatment planning system (TPS) doses was evaluated on Dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the heart and lungs. Re-evaluating dose distributions using out-of-field profiles revealed significant discrepancies in the low-dose region (<10 Gy) compared to standard TPS calculations for non-VMAT techniques.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: