Key result
Catheter ablation outcomes for AF in elderly patients remain undetermined due to missing study data.
Why the study?
The effect of advanced age on outcomes after catheter ablation for AF remains uncertain.
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have different efficacy and safety outcomes in elderly compared to non-elderly patients?
Meta-Analysis
Does catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation have different efficacy and safety outcomes in elderly compared to non-elderly patients?
Elderly patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation face higher risks of AF recurrence, mortality, stroke, and major procedural complications compared to non-elderly patients, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.
May warrant careful ablation selection in elderly AF patients; extends meta-analytic evidence on age-related recurrence and complication risks.
Background The effect of advanced age on outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared long-term efficacy and safety between elderly and non-elderly patients using time-to-event reconstruction. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for comparative studies up to January 2026. The primary outcome was AF recurrence. Secondary outcomes included mortality, stroke, and procedural complications. Pairwise meta-analysis estimated risk ratios (RR), and individual patient-level time-to-event data were reconstructed from Kaplan–Meier curves to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Results Twenty-eight studies involving 22,921 patients were included in the analysis. Elderly patients had a significantly higher risk of AF recurrence compared with non-elderly patients (RR 1.174, 95% CI 1.068–1.290; P < 0.001; I2 = 55%). This was consistent across age subgroups, including ≥ 80 years (RR 1.155, 95% CI 1.057–1.263; P = 0.001) and ≥ 75 years (RR 1.224, 95% CI 1.039–1.441; P = 0.015), with no significant subgroup difference (P = 0.54). Time-to-event analysis confirmed these findings (HR 1.138, 95% CI 1.055–1.227; P = 0.001), including ≥ 75 years (HR 1.147, 95% CI 1.037–1.268; P = 0.008) and ≥ 80 years (HR 1.127, 95% CI 1.005–1.264; P = 0.040). Elderly patients also had higher risks of all-cause mortality (RR 3.978, 95% CI 2.852–5.547; P < 0.001), stroke (RR 2.136, 95% CI 1.336–3.414; P = 0.002), hemopericardium/tamponade (RR 1.610, 95% CI 1.061–2.442; P = 0.025), atrioesophageal fistula (RR 4.398, 95% CI 1.638–11.811; P = 0.003), and pulmonary vein stenosis (RR 4.022, 95% CI 1.281–12.632; P = 0.017), with no significant differences in pericarditis (RR 1.830, 95% CI 0.653–5.129; P = 0.250), vascular complications (RR 1.183, 95% CI 0.854–1.637; P = 0.312), or phrenic nerve palsy (RR 1.449, 95% CI 0.985–2.130; P = 0.059). Conclusion Elderly patients have higher AF recurrence and increased risks of major complications, including mortality and stroke, after catheter ablation, underscoring the need for individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Shammari et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation. Catheter ablation was evaluated. Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in elderly patients could not be determined as the provided text only contains an index of supplementary figures without results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: