Key result
Posterior mitral leaflet extension using autologous pericardium shows ~17% long-term reintervention risk in children.
Why the study?
Achieving sufficient leaflet coaptation can be difficult in pediatric mitral regurgitation with posterior leaflet shortening or tethering, and reports on posterior leaflet extension using autologous pericardium in pediatric patients remain limited.
Does posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium improve outcomes and prevent reintervention in pediatric patients with mitral regurgitation?
Population
6 pediatric patients undergoing posterior mitral leaflet extension for MR
Comparison
Posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium
Design
Retrospective review
Follow-up
Median 10.6 (1.7–14.2) years
Authors
Loading...
Hypothesis-generating for pericardial extension in pediatric MR; larger prospective studies needed before adoption.
Observational (n=6)
Does posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium improve outcomes and prevent reintervention in pediatric patients with mitral regurgitation?
Posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium is a viable surgical option with favorable mid-term durability for pediatric patients with mitral regurgitation.
Kondo et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pediatric mitral regurgitation (n=6). Posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium was evaluated on Mortality and mitral valve reintervention. Posterior mitral leaflet extension using fresh autologous pericardium in pediatric patients resulted in no deaths and one mitral valve reintervention (16.7%) over a median follow-up of 10.6 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: