Key result
Lasmiditan demonstrated efficacy and safety for the acute treatment of individual migraine attacks independent of comorbid conditions, with no significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions.
Why the study?
Does lasmiditan maintain its efficacy and safety profile for the acute treatment of migraine regardless of patient comorbidities?
RCT
Does lasmiditan maintain its efficacy and safety profile for the acute treatment of migraine regardless of patient comorbidities?
The efficacy and safety of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine attacks appear to be independent of the presence of comorbid conditions.
No differential effect by comorbidity status; extends RCT evidence supporting lasmiditan use across comorbid migraine patients.
OBJECTIVE: receptor agonist approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: -values were calculated for treatment-by-subgroup interaction, based on logistic regression with treatment-by-comorbidity condition status (Yes/No) as the interaction term; study, treatment group, and comorbidity condition status (Yes/No) were covariates. Differential treatment effect based upon comorbidity status was also examined. Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov: SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174). RESULTS: Across all the Comorbidity Groups, with the potential exception of fatigue, treatment-by-subgroup interaction analyses did not provide evidence of a lasmiditan-driven lasmiditan versus placebo differential treatment effect dependent on Yes versus No comorbidity subgroup for either efficacy or TEAE assessments. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of lasmiditan for treatment of individual migraine attacks appear to be independent of comorbid conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clemow et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in migraine. Lasmiditan vs. placebo was evaluated on efficacy or TEAE assessments. Lasmiditan demonstrated efficacy and safety for the acute treatment of individual migraine attacks independent of comorbid conditions, with no significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: