Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Semi-humid subtropical montane regions face the dual pressures of climate change and water scarcity, making it essential to understand how soil carbon–water coupling varies among forest types. Focusing on seven representative forest types in the central Yunnan Plateau, this study analyzes the spatial distribution, trade-offs, and drivers of soil organic carbon storage (SOCS) and soil water storage (SWS) within the 0–60 cm soil layer, using sloping rainfed farmland (SRF) as a reference. We hypothesize that, relative to SRF, both SOCS and SWS increase across forest types; however, the direction and strength of the SOCS–SWS trade-off differ among plant communities and are regulated by litter traits and soil structural properties. The results show that SOCS in all forest types exceeded that in SRF, whereas a significant increase in SWS occurred only in ACF. Broadleaf stands were particularly prominent: SOCS rose most in the 23 yr SF and the 20 yr ACF (274.44% and 256.48%, respectively), far exceeding the 9–60 yr P. yunnanensis stands (44.01%–105.32%). Carbon–water trade-offs varied by forest type and depth. In conifer stands, SWS gains outweighed SOCS and trade-off intensity increased with stand age (RMSD from 0.48 to 0.53). In broadleaf stands, SOCS gains were larger, with RMSD ranging from 0.21 to 0.45 and the weakest trade-off in SF. Across depths, SOCS gains exceeded SWS in 0–20 cm, whereas SWS gains dominated in 40–60 cm. Regression analyses indicated a significant negative SOCS–SWS relationship in conifer stands and a significant positive relationship in 0–20 cm soils (both p 0.05). Correlation results further suggest that organic matter inputs, N availability, and soil physical structure jointly regulate carbon–water trade-off intensity across forest types and soil depths. We therefore recommend prioritizing native zonal broadleaf species, as well as protecting SF and establishing mixed conifer–broadleaf stands, to achieve synergistic improvements in SOCS and SWS.
Ding et al. (Tue,) studied this question.