Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cycloplegic effect on the accuracy of TOPCON AR RM-8000B autorefractometer in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 219 children of age 3 to 16 years. Topical 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride was instilled for attaining cycloplegia. The children with the refractive error of -0.75 Diopter or more were grouped as myopic and more than +1.00 Diopter as hyperopic. Autorefraction was performed in addition to manual refraction. We used the XLSTAT and Medcalc statistics software. RESULTS: Out of 219 children, 149 (68%) were emmetropic, 48 (22%) hyperopic and 22 (10%) myopic (n=70). Males and females constituted 29 (60.42%) and 19 (39.58%) respectively in hyperopic group where as 11 (54.55%) and 9 (45.45%) children were myopic. The means of ages of the children were 10.29 (+/- 2.96) and 13.14 (+/- 2.36) years in hyperopic and myopic groups respectively. Cycloplegic hyperopic and myopic autorefraction revealed mean sphere of +1.45 and -4.06 diopter with correlation coefficient of 0.95 and 0.99 respectively. Non-cycloplegic hyperopic autorefraction showed 74.2% sensitivity and 8.3% specificity at >-1 diopter with area under curve of 0.517 (p LESS THAN 0.0001). Cycloplegic hyperopic autorefraction showed 100% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity at >+1.85 diopter with accuracy of 0.616. Non-cycloplegic myopic autorefraction showed 100% sensitivity and 0.91% specificity at >-0.75 diopter with accuracy of 0.889. Cycloplegic myopic autorefraction showed 100% sensitivity and specificity at >-1.25 diopter with perfect accuracy. CONCLUSION: Non-cycloplegic hyperopic autorefraction failed to identify true negative cases. Cycloplegic autorefraction identified true positive cases and myopic autorefraction was relatively unaffected by cycloplegia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prabhakar et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: