Key result
Extended wireless patch Holters achieve 100% pediatric compliance, detecting arrhythmias missed by standard 24-hour monitoring.
Why the study?
Conventional 24-48 h Holter systems often cause discomfort, limit activity, and reduce compliance, potentially missing intermittent arrhythmias in paediatric patients.
Does extended 5-7 day wireless one-patch Holter monitoring improve diagnostic yield and compliance in paediatric patients requiring ambulatory ECG?
Observational (n=150)
Does extended 5-7 day wireless one-patch Holter monitoring improve diagnostic yield and compliance in paediatric patients requiring ambulatory ECG?
Extended 5-7 day wireless patch Holter monitoring is safe, well-tolerated, and improves the diagnostic yield for arrhythmias in pediatric patients by capturing events that occur beyond the standard 24-48 hour window.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support wireless patch Holter use in children; leaves open diagnostic yield versus conventional systems.
Background Holter ECG monitoring is essential for arrhythmia detection in children, yet conventional 24-48 h systems often cause discomfort, limit activity and reduce compliance. The wireless one-patch Holter monitoring devices (WOPH), enable continuous 5-7 day recording without cables, improving comfort and adherence. Extended monitoring is particularly relevant in paediatrics, where intermittent arrhythmias may be missed in shorter recordings. This study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic performance of WOPH in routine clinical use, including during sports and daily activities. Methods We prospectively studied 150 paediatric patients (<18 years) requiring ambulatory ECG, as part of the PAC-SAMS program. Each child wore a WOPH continuously for 5-7 days, performing normal activities including school and sports. Only swimming and excessive sweating were restricted. Families reported device tolerance and any technical issues. ECG data were analysed through a secure online platform. Outcomes included compliance, technical success, and diagnostic yield. Results All 150 patients completed monitoring without major device-related events. Compliance and tolerability were excellent, with no early removals or significant skin irritation. The patch remained adherent throughout the wear time; minor loosening from sweating was easily corrected. Children freely engaged in daily and sports activities. Workflow integration was simple and well accepted by staff and families. Extended monitoring provided a high diagnostic yield, detecting clinically relevant arrhythmias missed by traditional Holter. A significant proportion of patients presented their first abnormal event after 24 h, including paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, and intermittent AV block. Recordings during exercise revealed non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in some athletes, aiding diagnosis and treatment planning. Data quality remained high, and automated analysis allowed rapid interpretation. Conclusion Extended, patch-based Holter monitoring with the wireless one-patch Holter monitoring devices (WOPH), proved safe, well tolerated, and highly effective in children. The device’s comfort, water resistance, and simplicity enabled continuous rhythm surveillance during everyday life and sports. The longer, 5-7 day duration markedly enhanced diagnostic yield, capturing events beyond standard monitoring periods. With excellent compliance and minimal logistical burden, the WOPH is now part of our routine paediatric cardiology practice. This technology offers a practical and patient-friendly solution to improve arrhythmia detection and optimise cardiac care in young patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diez-Escute et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Arrhythmia / requiring ambulatory ECG (n=150). Wireless one-patch Holter monitoring devices (WOPH) was evaluated on Compliance, technical success, and diagnostic yield. Extended 5-7 day wireless one-patch Holter monitoring was completed by 100% of 150 pediatric patients without major adverse events, detecting arrhythmias missed by standard 24-hour monitoring.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: