Why the study?
The management of symptomatic or high-burden PVCs in athletes remains controversial, and data on procedural efficacy, safety, and functional recovery after catheter ablation in this population are limited.
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively reduce PVC burden and facilitate return to sport in competitive versus leisure-time athletes without structural heart disease?
Population
100 athletes aged ≥14 years undergoing catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs without structural heart disease
Comparison
Competitive athletes vs leisure-time athletes
Design
Single-centre retrospective study
Follow-up
9–15 months for clinical evaluation
Key result
Following catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs, competitive athletes achieved a lower follow-up PVC burden compared to leisure-time athletes (median 34.5 vs 274 PVCs/24 h; p=0.006).
Authors
Loading...
CA may support return to sport after ablation in athletes with PVCs; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm outcomes.
Cohort (n=100)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation effectively reduce PVC burden and facilitate return to sport in competitive versus leisure-time athletes without structural heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 34.5% vs 274%
p-value: p=0.006
Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a safe and highly effective treatment for idiopathic PVCs in athletes without structural heart disease, significantly reducing arrhythmic burden and facilitating return to sport.
Cardinali et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=100). Competitive athlete status vs. Leisure-time athlete status was evaluated on PVC burden reduction (p=0.006). Following catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs, competitive athletes achieved a lower follow-up PVC burden compared to leisure-time athletes (median 34.5 vs 274 PVCs/24 h; p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: