Why the study?
Low PVC frequency during catheter ablation is a recognized cause of procedural failure, prompting investigation into whether pre-procedural PVC burden relates to ablation outcomes.
Does pre-procedural PVC burden predict the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complexes?
Does pre-procedural PVC burden predict the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular complexes?
Pre-procedural PVC burden does not predict the success of catheter ablation for idiopathic PVCs, suggesting ablation is a reasonable option even for patients with rare but symptomatic PVCs.
Pre-procedural PVC burden should not deter ablation referral; leaves open reliable predictors of idiopathic PVC ablation success.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation of idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) is an effective method for eliminating symptoms and preventing/reversing arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy. One reason for procedural failure is low PVC frequency during the procedure. We aimed to investigate the relation between pre-procedural PVC burden and outcome of idiopathic PVC catheter ablation. METHODS: Patients who underwent idiopathic PVC ablation between 2013 and 2019 at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively included. All procedures were performed using irrigated-tip ablation catheters and a 3D electro-anatomical mapping system. Sustained ablation success was defined as a ≥80% reduction of pre-procedural PVC burden determined by 24h-Holter at follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 254 patients (median age 54 years [IQR 42-64]; 47% male) were enrolled. The median pre-ablation PVC-burden was 22% (IQR 11-31%), which was reduced to a post-ablation PVC burden of 0.3% (IQR 0-4%) after a median of 90 days. Sustained ablation success was achieved in 182 patients (72%). Pre-procedural PVC burden did not differ between patients with sustained ablation success and recurrence during follow-up (median 21% vs. 22%, p = .76). When assessed in pre-ablation PVC-burden groups of ≤5%, 6-15%, 16-30%, and ≥31%, sustained ablation success was achieved in 67%, 75%, 71%, and 72%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = .89). Sustained ablation outcome for PVC-burden ≤5% versus >5% showed no difference either (67% vs. 72%, p = .52). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural Holter-determined PVC burden does not predict the outcome of idiopathic PVC ablation. Thus, catheter ablation may be a reasonable first choice also for patients with symptomatic yet rare PVCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asatryan et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: