Key result
Rotor suppression during virtual antiarrhythmic testing predicts ~175% higher 1-year AF or AT recurrence post-ablation.
Why the study?
Predicting the most effective antiarrhythmic drug after AF ablation is clinically valuable, but in vivo pharmacologic testing and rotor mapping present major technical and ethical challenges.
Does digital twin-guided virtual drug testing for rotor suppression predict post-ablation AF/AT recurrence in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Cohort (n=50)
Does digital twin-guided virtual drug testing for rotor suppression predict post-ablation AF/AT recurrence in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Patient-specific digital twin simulations of antiarrhythmic drug effects can predict 1-year AF/AT recurrence after ablation based on the presence of rotor suppression.
Rotor suppression may flag higher AF recurrence risk; hypothesis-generating in this small observational cohort and requires prospective validation.
Background Accurate prediction of the most effective antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation offers substantial clinical value. Nevertheless, in vivo pharmacologic testing and rotor mapping present significant technical and ethical challenges. Purpose This proof-of-concept study applied patient-specific digital twin simulations to model drug-induced changes in stable phase singularities (PS, rotors) and evaluated their association with post-ablation recurrence, thereby establishing a framework for personalized rhythm management after AF ablation. Methods Patient-specific digital twin models were reconstructed using electroanatomical maps acquired during AF ablation. Virtual AF was induced under baseline and four simulated AAD conditions (low and high concentrations of amiodarone and dronedarone). PS were computationally identified from digital twin simulations using phase mapping, and stable PS were defined as those persisting for ≥2 s within a 10 mm-diameter spatial area. Rotor areas were quantified as the ratio of stable PS area to the total left atrial (LA) surface area excluding pulmonary vein regions. Rotor suppression was defined as a ≥1% reduction in this ratio under AAD conditions compared with baseline. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders, and post-ablation AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence was compared between the two groups. Results Fifty patients (mean age 62.0 ± 10.0 years; 14.0% women; 64.0% with persistent AF) who were treated with amiodarone or dronedarone during the 3-month blanking period were included. Baseline stable PS were identified in 48 patients (96%), with a mean PS-to-LA surface area ratio of 2.4 ± 2.3%. Rotor suppression was observed in 30 patients (60%), with a mean decrease in the ratio of 3.1 ± 1.6%, whereas nonresponders (n = 20, 40%) exhibited minimal change (0.3 ± 0.3%). Responders had significantly smaller LA diameter (42.2 ± 5.8 mm vs. 46.2 ± 5.8 mm; p = 0.022) and higher mean LA voltage (1.3 ± 0.5 mV vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 mV; p < 0.001) than nonresponders. During a 1-year follow-up, patients with rotor suppression demonstrated a lower AF/AT recurrence rate (log-rank p = 0.013). Rotor suppression remained an independent predictor of recurrence (adjusted HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.18–6.42; p = 0.019) and predicted 1-year AF/AT recurrence (AUC 0.762, 95% CI 0.625–0.898). Conclusion Digital twin–guided analysis enabled quantitative assessment of rotor suppression and revealed its significant association with post-ablation AF/AT recurrence. Rotor suppression during virtual AAD testing emerged as a predictive marker of clinical outcome, indicating that digital twin simulations could provide a mechanistic and personalized approach to post-ablation rhythm management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hwang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation post-ablation (n=50). Rotor suppression in digital twin simulations vs. No rotor suppression (nonresponders) was evaluated on 1-year atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia recurrence (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.18-6.42, p=0.019). Rotor suppression during virtual antiarrhythmic drug testing independently predicted 1-year atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia recurrence post-ablation (adjusted HR 2.75; 95% CI 1.18-6.42; P=0.019).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: