Key result
Stable phase singularities in virtual heart models are linked to ~4.8-fold higher 1-year AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Clinical outcomes of driver-targeted ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation have been inconsistent, highlighting the need for virtual heart-based approaches to characterize AF driver dynamics and guide ablation strategies.
Does virtual heart-based identification of stable phase singularities with stable dominant frequency predict AF recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Population
165 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation from the CUVIA-AF2 study
Comparison
Virtual heart-based identification of stable phase singularities and dominant frequency dynamics at extra-pulmonary vein regions
Design
Cohort study using left atrial virtual heart models integrating cardiac CT and electroanatomical maps
Follow-up
1 year
Authors
Loading...
Stable phase singularities with stable dominant frequency were associated with higher AF recurrence; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding ablation.
Cohort (n=165)
Does virtual heart-based identification of stable phase singularities with stable dominant frequency predict AF recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 5.78 (95% CI 2.18–15.3)
p-value: p=0.002
Virtual heart-based identification of stable phase singularities with stable dominant frequency is strongly associated with higher AF recurrence rates after ablation in persistent AF.
Hwang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (n=165). Stable phase singularities (PS) with stable dominant frequency (DF) vs. Stable PS with meandering DF or absence of stable PS was evaluated on AF recurrence at 1-year follow-up (HR 5.78, 95% CI 2.18-15.3, p=0.002). Stable phase singularities with stable dominant frequency in virtual heart models were associated with higher AF recurrence at 1 year (adjusted HR 5.78; 95% CI 2.18-15.3; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: