Key result
Pulsed field ablation for recurrent atrial tachycardia achieves ~64% recurrence-free survival, driven by non-inducibility.
Why the study?
The efficacy of pulsed field ablation for atrial tachycardia recurrent after radiofrequency ablation of initially persistent atrial fibrillation is unknown.
Does pulsed field ablation improve freedom from recurrence in patients with recurrent atrial tachycardia after prior radiofrequency ablation?
Cohort (n=178)
Does pulsed field ablation improve freedom from recurrence in patients with recurrent atrial tachycardia after prior radiofrequency ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 39%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Pulsed field ablation is highly effective for acute termination of recurrent atrial tachycardia resistant to prior radiofrequency ablation, with favorable long-term clinical outcomes, especially when non-inducibility is achieved.
Supports acute PFA success for AT termination; leaves open durability and comparative efficacy in randomized trials.
Introduction The efficacy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrent after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of initially persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is unknown. These AT sources are often complex/epicardial and located outside the pulmonary veins (PV) / posterior wall of the left atrium (LA). Purpose To present immediate and long-term results of PFA (Farapulse) for ATs that recurred after previous (re)RFA of original (longstanding) PeAF. Methods Between 3/2022 and 7/2025, 178 consecutive patients (65±9 years, 48 women) underwent PFA for recurrent AT in 196 procedures. Patients with combination of recurrent AF and AT were not included. The PFA procedure was overall the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th redo procedure in 53, 71, 55, 14, and 3 cases, respectively, all prior procedures were RFA, and the AT was already resistant at the previous procedure. The AT sources were identified with activation and entrainment mapping. Following termination of ongoing AT, arrhythmia non-inducibility tested with atrial pacing up to 300 bpm was the desired procedural endpoint. Follow-up included 7-day ECG monitoring at least at 3, 6, and 12 months and then every 6 months. Results At the procedure onset, the AT was persistent or induced in 130 and 66 cases, respectively. A total of 309 AT types were identified: macroreentry ATs (n=154) included peri-mitral AT (n=89), roof-dependent AT (n=47), and typical flutter (n=18); localized AT sources (smaller reentry/focal) (n=155) originated in the left atrium (n=133), right atrium (n=21) or was undetermined (n=1). At first PFA procedure, AT was terminated in 177/178 (99%) patients, and non-inducibility was achieved in 146 (82%) patients. In 161 patients with follow-up ≥6 (22±9) months, 64% patients remained free from recurrence (≥30 sec); patients with arrhythmia non-inducibility, as compared to those without non-inducibility proved, had better recurrence-free survival (69% vs. 39%, Log Rank p ˂0.0001) (Figures). At the end of follow-up, 86% and 70% patients were in stable SR on/off, respectively off AA drugs. Conclusions The acute efficacy in AT termination with PFA using the pentaspline catheter was nearly absolute, yet freedom from any arrhythmia recurrence was less favourable, and was significantly higher if arrhythmia non-inducibilty was achieved. Final clinical outcome is favourable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiala et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Recurrent atrial tachycardia after radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (n=178). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) with arrhythmia non-inducibility vs. PFA without arrhythmia non-inducibility was evaluated on recurrence-free survival (≥30 sec) at follow-up ≥6 months (p=<0.0001). Pulsed field ablation for recurrent atrial tachycardia resulted in 64% recurrence-free survival, which was significantly higher when arrhythmia non-inducibility was achieved (69% vs 39%, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: