Key result
A Random Survival Forest model using 82 clinical predictors could not accurately predict cardiac arrest in individual patients newly diagnosed with heart failure, yielding a C-index of 0.52.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a known risk condition for cardiac arrest, but 30-day survival after cardiac arrest remains low, prompting the need to identify high-risk patients to enable prevention.
Observational (n=45,068)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A machine learning model using registry data failed to accurately predict cardiac arrest in newly diagnosed heart failure patients, largely due to unmeasured competing risks like transitions to palliative care.
OBJECTIVE: 30-day survival after cardiac arrest is low, 12.4% and 36% for out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest, respectively. Heart failure is a known risk condition for cardiac arrest. Improving our ability to identify patients at high risk of cardiac arrest would enable prevention. We aimed to develop a prediction model for cardiac arrest to be used in patients newly diagnosed with heart failure. DESIGN: A nationwide registry-based observational study. SETTING: Data were sourced from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (1 January 2005 to 31 December 2021). PARTICIPANTS: This cohort included 45 068 patients discharged from hospital after first hospitalisation for newly diagnosed heart failure. Patients discharged from hospital with palliative care and/or implantable defibrillators were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was defined as cardiac arrest registered in the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation until final follow-up (15 November 2022). Patients who died without resuscitation were treated as competing events. A Random Survival Forest model for competing risk was developed using predictors from the heart failure registry. The model was evaluated with Brier score, observed versus predicted cumulative incidence, Concordance-index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristics graph (AUC-ROC). RESULTS: In this cohort, 2399 (5%) patients had received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (5%), and 31 989 (71%) patients died without resuscitation. Our model with 82 predictors had a low Brier score indicating a capacity to accurately predict cumulative incidence of cardiac arrest on a group level. However, the model also had a low C-index 0.52 and low AUC-ROC 0.63-0.65. CONCLUSION: Our Random Survival Forest model for competing risk could not accurately predict cardiac arrest in individual patients newly diagnosed with heart failure, because the event death without attempted resuscitation was treated as a competing event. The lack of information on transitions to palliative care and Do-Not-Attempt-CPR-orders limits the clinical relevance of any cardiac arrest prediction model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thuccani et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Newly diagnosed heart failure (n=45,068). Clinical predictors for machine learning model was evaluated on Cardiac arrest registered in the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (C-index 0.52). A Random Survival Forest model using 82 clinical predictors could not accurately predict cardiac arrest in individual patients newly diagnosed with heart failure, yielding a C-index of 0.52.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: