Why the study?
Real-world data on the longevity of contemporary S-ICD systems are still limited.
What is the real-world longevity of contemporary subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
What is the real-world longevity of contemporary subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
Contemporary S-ICD systems demonstrate excellent longevity of approximately 9 years in real-world settings, exceeding manufacturer projections, though frequent shocks modestly reduce battery lifespan.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Frequent shocks associated with shorter S-ICD longevity; leaves open whether remote monitoring can guide interventions to preserve battery life.
Background The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) provides effective protection against sudden cardiac death while avoiding transvenous leads. Real-world data on the longevity of contemporary S-ICD systems are still limited. Objective To assess the real-world longevity of current-generation S-ICDs and identify factors influencing battery performance in a multicenter, remotely monitored cohort. Methods Data from 2,130 EMBLEM S-ICD devices enrolled in the LATITUDE remote monitoring network across 24 Italian centers (2015–2025) were analyzed. Devices affected by the 2019 advisory on premature battery depletion or with an implant duration <3 months (n=241) were excluded. Longevity was defined as device duration plus the estimated remaining battery life at the latest remote transmission Results Median follow-up was 2.7 years (IQR 1.5–4.1). At the latest transmission, the estimated remaining battery life was 68 ± 19%. Median estimated device longevity was 9.0 years (IQR 8.7–9.2), approximately two years longer than manufacturer projections. Shock burden was the main determinant of reduced longevity: patients experiencing ≥2 shocks per year had an estimated lifespan shorter than those without shocks (7.0 vs. 9.1 years; p<0.001) (Figure 1). The effect of in-office interrogations and remote transmissions on battery life was negligible (<0.1 year). Devices implanted for >6 years showed slightly shorter estimated longevity compared to those implanted for 1–2 years (8.9 vs. 9.3 years; p<0.001). Conclusions In a large real-world cohort, contemporary S-ICD systems showed excellent and predictable longevity, exceeding manufacturer expectations. Battery performance was minimally affected by telemetry activity, while frequent shock delivery modestly reduced lifespan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziacchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: