Key result
Deep ensemble classifier detects ventricular oversensing among NSVT episodes with 100% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Ventricular oversensing can cause inappropriate shocks or pacing inhibition and is often incorrectly logged as NSVT, but identifying these low-prevalence, sometimes subtle episodes is time consuming.
Does a deep learning classifier accurately detect ventricular oversensing among NSVT episodes in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers?
Does a deep learning classifier accurately detect ventricular oversensing among NSVT episodes in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers?
A deep learning classifier can reliably differentiate physiological and non-physiological oversensing from true NSVT with very high sensitivity and precision, potentially improving early detection of lead dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High sensitivity supports automated oversensing screening; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
Background Ventricular oversensing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers can cause inappropriate shocks or inhibition of pacing and non-physiological oversensing is usually the first manifestation of ventricular lead dysfunction. Ventricular oversensing is often incorrectly logged as non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) by cardiac devices, but identifying these episodes is time consuming since some episodes are subtle and the overall prevalence of oversensing is low. Purpose To develop a clinically meaningful deep learning model with a high sensitivity for detecting ventricular oversensing amongst NSVT episodes. Methods NSVT remote monitoring transmissions from three French hospitals were used for training and internal validation and data from a fourth hospital served as an external validation cohort. After pretraining on atrial high rate events and synthetic NSVT episodes engineered from periodic electrograms, a deep ensemble classifier was trained to differentiate physiological or non-physiological oversensing from true NSVT. Results The external validation cohort comprised 2856 NSVT episodes (2732 true NSVT (95.6%) and 124 oversensing (4.4%)) with diverse oversensing episodes including non-physiological signals due to lead dysfunction, P wave, T wave and diaphragmatic oversensing (Figure). The deep ensemble classifier correctly identified all 124 oversensing episodes (100%) with only 8 false positive results (0.3%). This yielded sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.7%, positive predictive value 93.9% and F2 score 98.1 for detection of ventricular oversensing. Conclusion A deep learning classifier can reliably differentiate physiological and non-physiological oversensing from true NSVT with very high sensitivity and precision. This can improve early detection of lead dysfunction, prevent inappropriate therapies and reduce the workload of remote monitoring staff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiyagarajah et al. (2026) studied Ventricular oversensing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and permanent pacemakers. Deep ensemble classifier was evaluated on Detection of ventricular oversensing amongst NSVT episodes (Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 99.7%, PPV 93.9%). A deep ensemble classifier correctly identified ventricular oversensing among non-sustained ventricular tachycardia episodes with 100% sensitivity and 99.7% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: